Skip to main content

The Ethics of Buying Used When You're Not Poor

Supply and demand - a quick refresher

The economics of supply and demand are straightforward:  When demand for goods increases, prices go up. When the supply of goods increases, prices go down (where prices are not constrained by law or other factors).

The implication, then, is that if we all turn to buying our clothing used, it will drive up the price of used clothes, potentially pricing economically disadvantaged people out of the market. 

Meanwhile, there is no question that clothing now enjoys a second or even third act before being discarded. Witness the rise of Poshmark, an online retailer of clothing, both new and used. While it's touted as a way to shop other people's closets, it's also a way for sellers to perform a sort of "clothing arbitrage," purchasing quality or trendy clothing from Goodwill at rock-bottom prices, and then re-selling the clothing at a substantial markup via Poshmark.

If we all bought most of our clothing used and stopped buying primarily new clothing, however, something else would happen - the seemingly endless supply of new clothing would have to ratchet down. That would be good news, because what we currently have today is still way too much supply. As I wrote in an earlier blog, the equivalent of 81 pounds of discarded clothing per person in this country ends up in landfills every year. Buying at least some of your clothing used should help slow down demand on new clothing without appreciably driving up the prices of used clothing. I was just there today, trying to find one more warm winter top, and I can assure you that the prices are still low and will likely remain low as long as our supply of new clothing remains so strong.

Cowl neck sweater bought at a consignment store for $20.00

My wish for the future

I would love to see the day when clothing prices at Goodwill start going up because so many people are buying used. That might mean that the ridiculous oversupply of low-quality new clothing has begun to slow, or that the quality (and therefore the price) of new clothing has begun to rise.

I have had great fun writing this blog; I hope that you've had fun reading it. I feel that I've said everything I wanted to say about used clothing and money. I plan to leave the site up, and I may occasionally add to it, or edit blogs as new information and statistics come out. Thanks for following along.


Comments

  1. What an interesting perspective! I never thought about the demand for used clothing driving up the costs... But if the demand for new clothes dropped, the two markets would get narrower in price. That would be interesting.

    Meanwhile, I do think there are great bargains to be found at Goodwill and Savers if you take the time to look at labels. Hunting through the racks makes for a fun outing, and scoring a high end item (or two) for a fraction of the price is the reward.

    I have really enjoyed your posts! I do hope you will post future "finds" when you make them! It's inspiring to see what options are out there. 💙

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gift-Giving and The Problem with Stuff

 Most of us, let's be honest, are drowning in stuff. While minimalist Joshua Becker's post was written several years ago, I suspect that the statistics he cites, described below, have only gotten worse. TOO MUCH STUFF 1. The average household owns 300,000 items. Wow. 2. 32% of households only have room to park one car in a two-car garage (one in four can't park any car in their garage). 3. One out of ten of us rents offsite storage to deal with our excess stuff. As of March of 2020, there was 5.4 square feet of offsite storage space for every man, woman and child living in the U.S. 4. Even with all the stuff we have, we don't have enough money . I created this blog to encourage us all to be more conscious consumers of clothing - to consider buying quality clothing second-hand and to be more thoughtful about how much of it we really need. The goal is to keep our clothing from becoming just more stuff that's out of control. Naturally, these concepts go beyond cloth...

Having Enough (Thanksgiving Edition)

 I culled my closet a couple of weeks ago, inspired again by Courtney Carver's Project 333  to limit my clothes only to what I intend to wear over the next (in my case) four months. Everything else got put into drawers or taken to an unused closet upstairs. While I'm sure I've gotten some things wrong (I just haven't figured out what they are yet), it feels like a revelation to walk into my closet:  Not too much, and not too little, it's exactly enough. The "Fulfillment Curve" from Your Money or Your Life (Dominguez & Robin) What does having "enough" clothing look like? When I left my job as a financial advisor, I no longer had "enough" clothes. I had plenty of clothing for meeting with clients in person; I also had workout clothing and a couple of more formal dresses. But I didn't have anywhere near enough clothing to meet my new daily circumstances of hanging around the house, meeting with a friend or running errands. I'v...

Casualization of Clothing

 I'm taking a break from talking about used clothing this week to focus a bit on history. I recently saw a photograph of women from the 1920s, and it occurred to me what an amazing transformation had happened for women's clothing in just 30 years. Here's an image of what women wore in the 1890s. Note the long sleeves, high necklines and rear bustles. These outfits would also have required a corset underneath and petticoats. I found this image at ThisVictorianLife.com .  The couple who runs the site wears Victorian-era clothing in their everyday lives. Here is an image of what women wore in the 1920s. Note the (relatively) high hemlines, short sleeves and more contemporary necklines. Also note the low heel on the shoes. I found this image on a Pinterest page. While I personally prefer clothing that's a bit more figure-flattering, imagine the freedom these women from the 20s experienced compared to their 1890's sisters! Have things changed as much 100 years later? Ma...